Choosing a care management platform is one of the most consequential decisions an NDIS, aged care, or disability provider makes. The software you pick shapes how your team rosters shifts, documents care, bills funders, and stays compliant every single day. Lumary and CareIQ are both Australian platforms serving this sector, and each takes a distinct approach.
This comparison is written to be fair. We have based every statement about Lumary on publicly available information from Lumary's own website and reputable third-party sources, and we are upfront about what Lumary does well. The goal is to help you understand the genuine differences so you can decide which platform suits your organisation, rather than to talk down a capable competitor.
What is Lumary?
Lumary is an Australian care management platform headquartered in Adelaide, with a presence in Sydney. According to its website, Lumary is built natively on Salesforce and serves disability support providers, aged care organisations, and allied health practices. The company states it supports more than 200 providers and that over 500,000 care recipients receive services through the platform.
Lumary describes itself as an operational system for sustainable supports and care. Its capabilities span participant and client management, workforce scheduling and rostering, SCHADS award interpretation, billing and financial reporting, incident tracking, and compliance dashboards. For NDIS providers, Lumary automates billing against the NDIS Price Guide and generates claims for portal submission with bulk claiming support. Building on Salesforce also gives providers access to that platform's customisable, advanced reporting.
Independent commentary positions Lumary as an enterprise-grade product best suited to mid-to-large providers, often those managing 50 or more participants across multiple sites or with complex rostering and billing requirements. Reviews note that implementation typically takes three to six months for complex organisations, that pricing sits at the enterprise tier, and that successful rollouts benefit from internal champions with technical capability. These are the natural trade-offs of a powerful, highly configurable enterprise platform, and for large providers with dedicated operations teams they can be well worth it.
What is CareIQ?
CareIQ is an Australian-built, all-in-one platform for NDIS, aged care, and disability providers. Rather than assembling capabilities on top of a general enterprise framework, CareIQ is purpose-built for the care sector as a single connected system. It brings together rostering with a built-in SCHADS pay engine, clinical progress notes, incident reporting, medication administration records, NDIS invoicing and claim tracking, compliance tooling, a family portal, and a mobile app for frontline support workers.
The design philosophy behind CareIQ is that a support worker, a roster coordinator, and a finance officer should all be able to work in the same platform without stitching together modules or waiting on a long configuration project. The SCHADS pay engine, for example, calculates penalty rates, weekly overtime, and allowances directly from shift times and worker classifications, and NDIS invoicing maps shifts to the correct item codes and can export a PRODA bulk payment file.
How do CareIQ and Lumary compare at a glance?
Both platforms cover the core disciplines a care provider needs. The differences lie less in whether a capability exists and more in the underlying approach, the setup path, and the type of provider each is built around.
| Consideration | CareIQ | Lumary |
|---|---|---|
| Country | Australian-built | Australian, based in Adelaide |
| Sectors served | NDIS, aged care, disability | NDIS, aged care, disability, allied health |
| Platform approach | Purpose-built all-in-one | Built natively on Salesforce |
| Rostering | Yes, with built-in SCHADS pay engine | Yes, with SCHADS award interpretation |
| Clinical documentation | Notes, incidents, MAR, care plans | Participant management, incident tracking |
| NDIS billing | Invoicing, item codes, PRODA export | Price Guide automation, bulk claiming |
| Family portal | Yes | Check current offering |
| Mobile app | Yes, for support workers | Check current offering |
| Typical fit | Small to mid-size, growing providers | Mid-to-large, enterprise providers |
Where a cell says "check current offering," that reflects our commitment to only state what we can verify from public sources. Lumary may well offer these capabilities; confirm the specifics directly with Lumary during your evaluation.
How do the two approaches differ in practice?
The most important distinction is architectural. Lumary is built natively on Salesforce, which is a mature, enterprise-grade platform used across many industries. For a large provider, that foundation brings real strengths: deep configurability, powerful custom reporting, and the ability to extend the system with the wider Salesforce ecosystem. If your organisation already has Salesforce skills in-house or the appetite to build them, this can be a genuine advantage.
CareIQ takes the opposite path. It is a dedicated care product rather than a configuration of a general framework, which means the workflows are shaped specifically around NDIS and aged care from the ground up. A roster coordinator sees a SCHADS-aware calendar, a support worker opens a mobile app built for shift notes and medication records, and a finance officer generates NDIS invoices without moving between separate tools. The trade-off is less open-ended customisation than a Salesforce build, in exchange for a shorter path from sign-up to daily use.
Neither approach is universally better. A large multi-site provider with complex, unusual processes and a technical operations team may value Lumary's configurability. A provider that wants an integrated system running quickly, without a lengthy implementation project, may prefer CareIQ. If you are weighing several options at once, our guide to the best NDIS software for providers in 2026 puts these considerations in a wider context.
What should buyers consider on implementation and cost?
Implementation time and total cost are where enterprise and purpose-built platforms tend to diverge most, so it is worth thinking through your own situation honestly.
Public reviews indicate Lumary implementations typically run three to six months for complex organisations and that pricing sits at the enterprise tier. That is not a criticism; sophisticated, highly configurable software generally requires more setup, and larger providers often have the internal resources to support it. If your organisation is large, has dedicated operations staff, and needs deep customisation, that investment can pay off.
CareIQ is positioned for a faster setup and for providers who would rather not run a multi-month configuration project. Smaller and growing providers, sole traders scaling up, and organisations that want predictable costs often weigh this heavily. The buyer consideration here is straightforward: match the implementation effort and price point to your size and internal capability, not to the largest provider in the room.
Which platform is the better fit for your provider?
The honest answer is that it depends on your organisation. Here is a fair way to frame the decision:
- Consider Lumary if you are a mid-to-large provider, likely managing 50 or more participants across multiple sites, with complex or unusual workflows, a dedicated operations or technology team, and the appetite for a longer, enterprise-grade implementation with the customisation that brings.
- Consider CareIQ if you want an all-in-one Australian platform that covers rostering, SCHADS payroll, clinical documentation, NDIS invoicing, compliance, family communication, and a support worker mobile app in one connected system, with a faster path to going live.
Many providers sit somewhere in the middle, and the only reliable way to decide is to test each platform against your real caseload and workflows. If you are comparing more broadly, our CareIQ vs ShiftCare comparison and CareIQ vs Brevity comparison look at how CareIQ stacks up against other well-known options in the market.
What does CareIQ include out of the box?
Because CareIQ is designed as a single system, most of what a care provider needs day to day is included rather than assembled. That includes:
- Rostering with a built-in SCHADS pay engine that calculates penalty rates, weekly overtime, and allowances automatically from shift times and worker classifications.
- Clinical documentation, including structured progress notes, incident reporting, medication administration records, and care plan goals.
- NDIS invoicing and claim tracking, mapping shifts to the correct item codes with a PRODA bulk payment export and claim status workflow.
- Compliance tooling, including qualification expiry tracking and roster checks that flag issues before they become problems.
- A family portal that gives families secure, permission-based visibility into care.
- A mobile app built for frontline support workers to clock in, write notes, and record medication on the go.
You can learn more about how NDIS claiming works across any platform on the official NDIS pricing arrangements page, and check current SCHADS obligations with the Fair Work Ombudsman. Doing that homework helps you evaluate any vendor's claims, ours included, on their merits.
See CareIQ for Yourself
The best way to compare care platforms is to try one against your own workflows. Start a free trial of CareIQ and see how an all-in-one Australian system fits your provider.
Start Your Free TrialFrequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between CareIQ and Lumary?
Both are Australian care management platforms for NDIS, aged care, and disability providers. Lumary is built natively on Salesforce and positions itself as an enterprise platform for mid-to-large providers; independent reviews suggest implementation typically takes three to six months. CareIQ is a purpose-built all-in-one platform that combines rostering, a built-in SCHADS pay engine, clinical notes, incidents, medication records, NDIS invoicing, compliance, a family portal, and a mobile app in one system designed for faster setup. The right choice depends on your size, budget, and how much configuration you want to manage.
Is Lumary built on Salesforce?
Yes. According to Lumary's own website, its platform is built natively on Salesforce. This gives providers access to Salesforce's enterprise infrastructure and its customisable reporting, and it also means providers should factor in the Salesforce ecosystem when planning implementation and ongoing administration.
Which is better for a small NDIS provider, CareIQ or Lumary?
It depends on your needs. Independent reviews position Lumary as suited to mid-to-large providers, often those with multiple sites and complex requirements, and suggest implementation typically takes three to six months. Small and growing providers who want a single all-in-one platform with a shorter setup path often find a purpose-built product like CareIQ a closer fit. The best approach is to trial the software against your own workflows before deciding.
Does CareIQ handle NDIS billing and SCHADS pay like Lumary?
Both platforms cover NDIS billing and SCHADS award interpretation. Lumary automates billing against the NDIS Price Guide and generates claims for portal submission. CareIQ includes a built-in SCHADS pay engine that calculates penalty rates, overtime, and allowances, plus NDIS invoicing with item codes and a PRODA bulk payment export. Providers should confirm the specific workflows they need are supported in a live trial.
How do I choose between CareIQ and Lumary?
Start by listing your must-have workflows: rostering, payroll, clinical documentation, NDIS claiming, compliance, and family communication. Then weigh implementation time, ongoing administration effort, total cost, and how well each platform fits your team size. Lumary is positioned for larger, enterprise providers with dedicated operations teams. CareIQ is positioned as an all-in-one system with faster setup. Run a trial or demonstration of both against your real caseload before committing.